Saturday, January 28, 2006

The end of a very stupid era

The Associated Press (via ESPN.com) is reporting that the NHL's Anaheim Mighty Ducks are set to change their team name at the start of next season, removing the "Mighty" and becoming just the Anaheim Ducks.

The AP article also indicates that the derisible name was given by the team's first owners, the Walt Disney Company:

The Mighty Ducks were formed as an expansion franchise in 1993, and named by then-Disney chairman Michael Eisner after the company's movie of the same name.

That "movie of the same name," of course, was the forgettable live-action hockey movie starring Emelio Estevez. At least, it would have been forgettable, if Disney hadn't shamefully named a professional sports franchise after it. What a travesty. The team is under new ownership now, and this move seems to demonstrate a desire to be taken seriously.

The Ducks' Major League Baseball counterpart, the formerly Disney-owned Angels, recently took a similar step. They were the California Angels before Disney bought them and renamed them the Anaheim Angels so as to include the title of their pretend city. New ownership moved slightly away from that and renamed the team the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim, which of course just gets shortened to the LA Angels, which of course is what it should be in the first place.

I dunno, it's late and I'm apparently grumpy or something. But the point is that Anaheim and Orlando are stupid and not real places, naming a pro sports team after a kids' movie is foolish, and it's better that Disney just keep its hands off stuff that matters. I can't wait to see how they screw up Pixar. Yeesh.

UPDATE: It turns out the city of Anaheim is suing the Angels' new owner. If that interests you, read the article here.

Thursday, January 26, 2006

Patience on probation

I admire my wife for many reasons, but one of her best qualities is patience. Her patience is manifested in all sorts of ways: in the slow, steady work of gaining the trust of the students in her conflict resolution groups; in the way she's able to hold a Hamilton (or even a Jackson) in her pocket and not feel compelled to spend it right away; in the tenderness she shows our son, who by the way is so advanced that he is experiencing the Terrible Twos at only 18 months of age; and not least in the hundreds of ways she puts up with me. (She hardly even rolls her eyes anymore.)

But one of the most admirable displays of patience I have seen is in her career path. Just after we were married, we moved to Las Vegas so I could be part of a pastoral team starting a new church there. Tracey had graduated with degrees in criminal justice and psychology, and her immediate career goal was to become a juvenile probation officer. Naturally, she took the exam as soon as we arrived in Las Vegas, but it's a lengthy process. Almost two years later, literally days after we had decided to discontinue the church's ministry and return to Rochester, the county called. They wanted to offer her a job. She had to decline.

Upon our return to Rochester in mid-2001, Tracey again set the wheels in motion, taking the exam for Monroe County's Department of Probation. Although she scored very high, the county was in a hiring freeze, which depending on your political leanings you might be inclined to blame on the Democrats in the local and state government or the Republicans in the Congress and White House. Whichever scapegoat you choose, the economy sucked and there were no new positions being filled in the department.

Tracey went on to other things, just as she had done while she waited in Las Vegas. She found herself in a few different nonprofit social work settings, doing challenging, thankless work for a crappy salary with lousy benefits. She waited, and waited, and waited. Several months back, the county finally called: they were ready to hire, and wanted her to come in for an interview!

She interviewed a couple times, and the department did background checks. Talked to lots of people we know, all of whom of course gave honest, glowing reviews about Tracey's character and work ethic. But as government agencies are prone to taking months to complete a process the private sector would have done in a week, there was no real timeline for when Tracey might be able to get the job. Eventually, she heard from her contacts in the probation department that there had only been one position open, and it had been filled. Probably someone who knew someone. That's the way this kind of thing goes.

Disappointed but not overwhelmed, Tracey moved on. Last month she began the process of applying to grad school so she could become a school psychologist. She submitted the application last Friday.

On Monday, the head of the county probation department called and told Tracey they'd like to offer her a job.

Over four years of waiting—six years, if you count Las Vegas—has finally come to an end. Yesterday Tracey accepted the job offer from the county. In true governmental form, it will be a couple months at least before the psychological evaluation, drug test, and other hoops are jumped. But by springtime, my wife will be a probation officer, and I am very proud of her.

Not just because she got a good job, but because she was so patient along the way.

Tuesday, January 24, 2006

Mini-review VIII: Let the Church Say Amen

Let the Church Say Amen

Recommended? With some reservation

Comments: A well-made documentary about a segment of the church that is really foreign to me. So foreign, in fact, that it made me slightly uncomfortable at points. That it inspired this internal discord is part of what makes the film successful, I think. But it's not for everyone.

(For an explanation of the Mini-review series, click here.)

Thanks, Mike

I'd like to thank Mike for this chord:

--0--
--3--
--5--
--5--
--x--
--5--


That'd be a really nice-sounding Am7add4, I think. (I'm not sure if there's a more accurate way to represent it, but the notes are A-G-C-D-E.) I'm currently working on a progression, trying to surround it with other chords and make it go somewhere:

--x---x---x---?--
--3---8---8---?--
--5---7---9---?--
--5---5---9---?--
--x---x---x---?--
--5---7---8---?--


That'd be Am7add4 - G/B - Cmaj7 - ???. I could resolve it to a D chord (barred in E shape on the 10th fret), but that sounds a little too pat and sturdy. Any ideas, throw them in the comments. Thanks again, Mike!

Monday, January 23, 2006

Mini-review VII: Hoop Dreams

Hoop Dreams

Recommended: Yes

Comments: This was at one time the highest-grossing documentary in history. If you are interested in basketball or the challenges of low-income urban life—or if you just want to check out some fantastic early '90s flat-tops from the 'hood—you should definitely check it out. It's very long, though: about three hours.

(For an explanation of the Mini-review series, click here.)

Monday Columns

I've been wanting to find a way to make my longer, more thought-out posts become more frequent for a few months now. And for the past week or so, the addition of the Mini-review series has cluttered up my blog quite a bit. (It's not that they're taking up time I'd be spending posting other stuff; it's just that they're quite frequent and they started at a time when I was having to direct my creative energies toward preparing sermons.) Also, I have a list of ideas that need require than a few paragraphs to flesh out.

All this has led me to a decision that I want to try to write a "column" every week, a longer topical piece that will come out on Mondays sometime during the workday. For all I know, this idea will fizzle quickly; most of my predictions for what this blog will become have been inaccurate. This is something I really want to do, though, and I do have a number of topics on deck, so it should last for a month or two at least. Without further ado, here is my first Monday Column.

Cash On the Barrelhead

About a month ago, my dad made a special request: he asked for a blog post explaining why I like Johnny Cash. I think he is somewhat baffled by it. Not surprising, since I sure didn't get it from him. Nothing even remotely like Johnny Cash ever made it to the stereo in my house as I was growing up. Oh, no. My father instilled in me a hatred of two great evils: cats, and country music. Come to think of it, this has served me well for the most part.

But that's not really the point, because in spite of the fact that Johnny Cash CDs can be found in the country section of any record store, his music does not sound like country to me. I realize that this indicates I am completely ignorant about country music, but I think we can all agree that what you hear on country stations today—Shania Twain and Toby Keith and all the related nonsense—is from a completely different genre of music than Johnny Cash.

My first exposure to Cash was not any more pleasant than listening to country radio, however. I was working in the music department of the Borders store in Henderson, NV, where my friend Arnold was the music manager. Arnold is a huge Cash fan, and American III: Solitary Man had just been released. For those unfamiliar with the American recordings, they are mostly covers of timeless songs, from Leonard Cohen to Tom Petty to Appalachian folk songs to the Beatles. ("American" refers to the record label, not necessarily the national origin of the songs.) One morning, I walked into the music department just as Arnold was cueing up a song that I found to be the most offensive cover tune I had ever heard. It was Johnny Cash singing U2's "One," from the epic 1991 release Achtung Baby.

Now you have to understand something. Achtung made my list of the top 10 CDs of the '90s, and "One" warranted special mention as one of "the most haunting, gorgeous songs recorded during my lifetime." Someday I'll write a list of songs that no one should ever bother singing, songs that are just Done, definitively. U2's "One" will be on this list, along with Paul McCartney's "Wonderful Christmastime" and Dusty Springfield's version of "The Look of Love." (Diana Krall, I'm looking in your direction.) So to hear anyone covering this song would have disturbed me, but Johnny Cash's version is so dramatically, even violently different that it actually made me angry. You truly have to listen to it to it to understand what I mean. I once played it for a friend while he was driving, and his reaction almost sent us flying off I-90.

The rest of the album did nothing to atone for this grave sin in my mind. My initial thoughts went something like this: His version of "I Won't Back Down" seemed unmelodic and just weird with Tom Petty singing a harmony part. Neil Diamond's "Solitary Man," the original version of which I have still never heard and don't care to, sounded weird and lyrically pathetic. The coup de grace was the Egbert Williams-penned "Nobody," a nearly spoken-word whine job that was a poor excuse for a song—even a sad song. It is safe to say that when it came to Johnny Cash and me, it was not love at first sight. That did not stop Arnold from playing it four or five times every shift.

And soon I found I could not get these songs out of my mind. Granted, that's not always a good thing; I sometimes can't get the theme from "Elmo's World" out of my head. But in this case, I found myself slowly beginning to warm to these songs—especially the Neil Diamond title track, to my great dismay. (Maybe my dad will do us all the great service of leaving a comment that includes the story of the time he met "Mr." Diamond.) Something about Cash's honest, unpretentious vocal interpretation appealed to me. That voice had an arresting presence; it stopped me in my tracks just as Bono's or Ella Fitzgerald's had the first time I heard them, albeit with a dramatically different type of sound. I couldn't resist listening to it.

I wanted to hear more, but I didn't know where to begin. I knew he'd been recording since the '50s, so it was a rather intimidating catalogue to try to wade through unguided. Fortunately, my friend Arnold is, as I've said, a huge Cash fan. I asked him to tell me which albums someone should listen to first in order to understand Johnny Cash better. He told me to start with the prison recordings, 1968's At Folsom Prison (which became the setting for much of last year's fantastic Cash biopic, Walk the Line, my thoughts on which are here) and 1969's At San Quentin.

Johnny Cash had huge hits with these recordings, but since that happened before I was born, it is difficult for me to comment about their place in American popular music. But I can say that the prison recordings represent what I love most about Johnny Cash; these concerts are little allegories of his own faith and life. He had lived hard, and although he never went to prison (only jail overnight a few times), it is not hard to imagine he might have ended up there if left completely to his own devices. He had great empathy for these prisoners, and what's more, he had a deep, abiding Christian faith that inspired him to reach out to them. Inevitably his critics will point out the crassness of a line like "I shot a man in Reno just to watch him die," and it's unfortunate that these same people will never listen to the entire Folsom recording to hear him finish the set with "Greystone Chapel" (lyrics here).

There is a great scene in Walk the Line, one that is probably fictionalized but rings true to my understanding of Johnny Cash. Cash is arguing with a record producer, trying to convince him to record a concert at Folsom Prison. The producer argues, "John, the people who listen to your music are good Christian people. They don't want to hear this! They don't want to hear you sympathizing with a bunch of convicted felons." Cash's reply: "Then they're not real Christians." In light of Matthew 25:31-46, I think his perspective is fairly accurate, no matter how wildly he may have been living at the time.

This is a huge part of what Cash has given to me. His faith was honest and very much imperfect, but he was still one of the faithful. I grew up in a tradition where it is very difficult for people to accept as real the faith statement of a person who shows any outward sign of sin. If the perceived sin involves substance abuse of any type, people are even quicker to draw a heavy black line across the offender's name in their mental list of the saved. It took me several years to stop assuming that if I saw someone smoking a cigarette, they were not a Christian. Seriously! This sounds patently absurd to me now (thankfully—because it is), but that was one effect the Holiness tradition had on me. I promise to delve into this in more detail, probably in a future Monday Column. For now, I will leave the subject except to say that Johnny Cash epitomized the idea that we don't have to have everything All Figured Out in order to be on the journey of faith, following Jesus. In fact, he turned his own raucous life to the advantage of the kingdom of God, using his credibility to gain an audience with hardened criminals so he could sing them gospel songs.

You can say, "Okay, but I think his voice is really terrible." Fair enough. Some people like Neil Young; some people like David Crosby. Some people like Billie Holiday; some people like Ella Fitzgerald. Some people like speed metal; some people like 1950s Broadway standards. As they say, there's no accounting for taste. At least no one can say Cash's voice sounds like everything else. And if you're one of those people who just can't get past the dark, droning timbre of Cash's voice, perhaps you might want to try a little harder. Remember, it took many spins of American III before it started to grow on me. You might find that like many other great pleasures in life, Johnny Cash is hard to enjoy at first. If it's sweet you want, there's plenty of sugary music to be found on today's pop charts. But none of it matters.

Johnny Cash's music does.

Holy cats!

Kobe scored 81.

Wednesday, January 18, 2006

Mini-review VI: Grizzly Man

Grizzly Man

Recommended: Not quite.

Comments: Nearly all the promise of a documentary about a guy who lives with grizzly bears for 13 years evaporates when it turns out that 1) the bear footage is shot almost entirely on an an unmanned tripod with the bears in the distant background, and 2) the guy who lived with the grizzlies is an unlikable weirdo. Bonus points for the narration by director Werner Herzog, and this isn't a horrible movie, but I was ultimately unsatisfied.

(For an explanation of the Mini-review series, click here.)

Monday, January 16, 2006

Mini-review V (Special Theater Edition)

Wallace and Gromit: The Curse of the Were-Rabbit

Recommended: Surely!

Comments: Saw this one at the second-run theater in Rochester. On the afternoon of a national holiday. It's rated G. Yeah, wasn't thinking so clearly about that one. Still, it was highly enjoyable. Was it just me, or did Nick Park and his mates at Aardman produce a slightly lower quality film than usual? This one just seemed a touch under the high bar set by the Wallace and Gromit shorts and Chicken Run. The clay didn't seem as smooth, and there were more non-animated shots and computer effects than in the studio's previous work. Even if that is an accurate observation, this is still really entertaining. To paraphrase Joe Torre, 75% of a Nick Park movie might be better than 100% of a lot of other movies. We loved it!

For a few of my friends

This link is for a few of my friends, the ones who can't stand to have any of part their dinner touching any other part. You know who you are! Oh, and consider yourself profanity-warned.

Friday, January 13, 2006

Mini-review IV: Lords of Dogtown

Lords of Dogtown

Recommended: Yeah, sure.

Comments: Skateboarding is not really my kind of thing, but this is an okay movie nonetheless. The best part was Tony Hawk playing an astronaut who falls off a board during a photo op with one of the skaters. Also, there was some killer rock and roll during the '70s, and a whole bunch of it makes it into this film.

While I'm here, though, I want to put in another plug for Murderball. A documentary about wheelchair rugby played by paraplegics, it was really excellent, not to mention much more broadly appealing than you'd think given the subject matter.

(For an explanation of the Mini-review series, click here.)

Thursday, January 12, 2006

Because Cranfill asked...

Here are my thoughts in brief about the Macworld Keynote, where all the latest Apple products were announced and demonstrated. You can watch the presentation here if you wish. Here's the stuff Steve Jobs talked about, followed by my responses.

iPod sales:
Apple sold over 14 million iPods in the December 2005 quarter alone. What is most remarkable about that number is that not one of them was bought as a gift for me.

iLife '06:
Some people get irritated that Apple updates this suite every year and asks people to pay $79 for it. I say it's usually worth it, and I try to remind people that it does come free on every new Mac, whereas nothing even close comes installed on a Windows PC; nor could anything close be bought for less than 80 bucks and made to run on a Windows PC.

The iPhoto update has a couple very interesting features, most notably photocasting, whereby a user can publish an RSS feed of new photos, allowing subscribers to be able to download these photos to their own machine automatically. If my family used Macs, this would be so absolutely handy I can hardly describe it. But they don't. (Mom and Dad, if you're reading, this alone should be enough reason for you to buy an iMac.) Full-screen editing and multi-photo comparisons are a feature that will no doubt get significant use. Also, the new calendar printing option in iPhoto appears to be fabulous.

GarageBand also got a neat little update that allows users to create their own podcasts. Here's the thing about Apple. They put stuff on their machines that allows people to do stuff they won't even want to do for at least another year. Is podcasting to 2006 what digital home movies were to 2000? Probably not, but the point is that Microsoft's free movie editing "software" is years behind Apple's iMovie, and if you did want to create a podcast, you'd be lost with anything Microsoft bundles with their OS.

Speaking of which, the stuff you can do with the new iMovie...whoa. Animated themes are truly remarkable. You really have to see it to understand it. It occurs at about the 33rd minute of the Keynote. To be able to do that kind of thing on your home computer is quite a rush. Then again, I'm sure once Vista comes out (c. 2008) you'll be able to put fancy titles over the actual movie footage, so we'll certainly look forward to that, Greg.

The new application, iWeb, is a classic bit of Apple-ness. It allows you to publish your own website, integrating all the other iLife applications so you can include your photos, movies, music, podcasts, etc. and giving you very attractive templates to use in doing so. I will enjoy testing this out and perhaps using it, though I hear the blog features are notably lacking the ability to accept comments.

iWork '06:
Yawn. Moving on...

Intel-based iMac:
I have thought for about a year now (ever since they went to the current case design) that the iMac is the best Mac money can buy, so there wasn't much you could do to impress me more. I'm not one who's been dancing in nervous anticipation for the Intel era, either; I can't afford a new Mac now and won't need one until they've had a couple revisions. But yeah, it's way faster than the current ones. Great. Didn't it just get two fairly significant upgrades?

MacBook Pro:
That's a lousy name, even though I do agree it's good to have "Mac" in all your product names. There's a lot of debate raging about this machine, most of which I don't find very interesting (see previous paragraph). I think it will be a very good laptop, but I would not buy one right now even if I did have the money—not unless I was desperate for a new laptop.

Summary:
All in all, this was a pretty boring Keynote, unless you were dying to see the beginning of the MacIntel era. There is a rumor that some really awesome products got bumped because they weren't ready. That rings true to me. Ultimately, the only product I really want after this Keynote is iLife, and there is some worry that it won't run well on pre-Intel Macs, so I give this year's Keynote a B-minus.

Wednesday, January 11, 2006

Tuesday, January 10, 2006

Ten-second thoughts

1. Just because you don't have the luxury of sitting in a padded, ass-shaped stool when you play your instrument in your musical ensemble of choice doesn't mean you are not responsible for employing a good sense of rhythm.

2. One of the drawbacks to using an iPod outside in winter is that the cable gets very stiff when it's cold, and the earbuds pop out of your ears if you move too much. I hate that.

3. People who lurk at popular blogs all day so they can post "FIRST!" in the comments section as soon as a new post is published? Those people should really consider finding something more meaningful to get excited about.

4. Yeah, I just ended a sentence with a preposition. That's how I roll.

5. Squeeze-bottle mayonnaise is a divinely inspired invention. Spray-bottle butter, on the other hand, might as well have horns and a red tail.

6. I'm pretty much over the Dave Matthews Band, but the Live at Red Rocks version of "Seek Up" can still give me chills.

7. I'm giving the talk (aka "sermon") this week at Artisan Church. Feel free to drop by Sunday night at 5. The topic is "hearing the voice of God" based on 1 Samuel 3.

Mini-review II: Pi

Pi

Recommended: No

Comments: I really wanted to like it; I just couldn't. Gratuitously low budget, awkward acting, choppy writing, and an audio track that is too often an offense to the ears. Also, math is hard.

Monday, January 09, 2006

Suck my breath away

A friend who works at a school recently wrote a funny blog entry about the low-budget announcement of the school's prom theme, which happens to be "Take My Breath Away."

My immediate response was this:

"What is with prom themes being songs from before the current crop of high school kids was even born? I mean seriously, this is not a new phenomenon; my prom theme, in 1994, was Eric Clapton's 'Wonderful Tonight.' (And they still played 'Stairway to Heaven' last.)"

Then, in searching for the song on iTunes (so I could find out what year it was released), I came to the disturbing realization that it was probably not the classic 1986 "Love Theme From Top Gun" Time-Machine-Music version by the band Berlin, but the pointless, bland, nut-wrenching rehash by Jessica Simpson.

Which of course is much sadder. I'm trying to conceive of how unimaginably awful the state of pop music must be today if this is the defining song for a group of high school students on the cusp of the biggest night of their lives, but it's just too depressing.

Homestar, Scooby Doo, and the Muppet Babies

Just when I thought Strong Bad Emails had jumped the shark, I was met today by a a hilarious new edition. If this sample of the HSR gang a la Scooby Doo back in high school doesn't make you laugh, it's probably because you've never gotten into Homestarrunner.com in the first place. (Incidentally, if you've never gotten into Homestarrunner.com, this episode is not the place to start.)

MARZIPAN: Scampers! My long lost uncle's abandoned pie factory sure is mysterious.

STRONG BAD: Aw, there's no such thing as "mysterious."

HOMESTAR RUNNER: I don't want to take any chances. We should play in a band, just to be safe.



Also of note from sbemail140: the gang flashes back to a Muppet Babies middle school past, complete with Homestar's legs in bloomers as the Nanny; a great asexual reproduction gag (who doesn't laugh at that, eh?); and an old-timey Easter egg with a cameo by Don Knotts.

Excellent.

Saturday, January 07, 2006

Yep, that's our running back



From The Washington Post:

"The Washington Redskins running back appeared as 'Coach Janky Spanky' for his weekly Thursday meeting with reporters, wearing an inflatable coach's headset, huge false ears, a whistle and black shorts covering an enormous gut."

Does this bode well for the Redskins' chances in Tampa Bay this afternoon? I can't tell.

Friday, January 06, 2006

Reviewing my movie rentals

OK, here's a new soon-to-be recurring item for Postus Frequentus, one that will hopefully help it live up to its name. Since we have Blockbuster Online and watch a lot of movies, I've decided to try reviewing them here. Nothing ambitious, just a simple "yea or nay" and perhaps a sentence or two. I'll link each movie to its synopsis on RottenTomatoes.com, tell you if I recommend it or not, and give you my most prominent reaction. (Note that the synopsis I link to contains MPAA rating information, so I won't be warning about "offense factors" unless there is some clear reason to do so.) You can expect about 3-4 of these a week, unless I get bored with it. Let's start with...

Born Into Brothels

Recommended? Yes.

Comments: Not nearly as depressing as you might expect a movie about the children of prostitutes in India to be. Art really changed these kids' lives.

Mac stats

It figures. Just when I post asking for advice from Mac users, Mac readership is down to 8%, the lowest I've ever seen it. It usually hovers around 20%. Oh well.

Playoff experience is what?

Warning: word nerd alert.

In comments about the upcoming NFL playoffs during his opening on today's radio show, Jim Rome said the following: "In the playoffs, experience is tantamount."

Um...you mean "paramount," maybe?

Am I the only guy in the world who cares this much about words and the NFL playoffs? (Go 'Skins!)

Preparing for a Steve Jobs keynote

With the Macworld Expo and a Steve Jobs keynote address only four days away, I thought you might enjoy this story about the type of preparation that goes into creating one of those "reality distortion fields." The aptly-named Mike Evangelist, a former project manager at Apple, describes his experience with this stressful process in an article in the Guardian titled "Behind the magic curtain":

"My first experience of this preparation came in the runup to the Macworld Expo keynote of January 2001, which was to include new Macs able to burn DVDs - then an amazing capability. Steve wanted to show off the new software, iDVD, that could do it. As I was the product manager for Apple's DVD software, I had to organise everything that Steve would need."

Interesting stuff. I can't wait to watch the keynote address this year; there should be some exciting new products in the pipeline! Quick, somebody distract Tracey so I can buy them all!

Thursday, January 05, 2006

Safari vs. Firefox 1.5

I need some help from my Mac-using readers. I know you're lurking out there, so please give me some advice.

With the release of Firefox 1.5, I am revisiting the possibility of switching from Safari. There are two reasons why I've stuck with Safari so far. The first is speed: Firefox 1.0 was markedly slower than Safari. The second is general usability: there were a few nagging feature liabilities in Firefox that trumped its major selling point, extensibility.

Firefox 1.5 seems to have addressed the first issue; it now opens in a reasonable amount of time, and page load is as fast as Safari—maybe faster. So I'm asking for a little advice. Firefox users, please tell me why you prefer it to Safari. Safari users, please tell me why you don't use Firefox.

Windows users, kindly zip it. Yes, Firefox is far and away better than the browser bundled with your OS, but careful readers will note that this is irrelevant to my situation. That said, if you have something that is relevant, don't hesitate to post it.

Thanks in advance for your help!

Wednesday, January 04, 2006

What kind of pastor am I, anyway?

I've recently been accused of identifying myself as a pastor in my profile without saying much about my church within the context of that pronouncement—yes, in spite of the fact that the church website is prominently linked at the top of my blog. Anyway, wouldn't you know it, our church was recently featured in the denomination's online newsletter. The article was about our commission of art pieces for use in worship during Advent, the season leading up to Christmas. This project was spearheaded not by me but by my friend and colleague Mike, who deserves great credit for making this happen. But still, it says something about Artisan, and I thought you might be interested. To read the article, click here.

But the accusation was not entirely unfounded, I suppose. It's been a while since I posted anything of much theological significance, so I hope to do that soon.

Monday, January 02, 2006

Sociology at BJ's

Tonight while shopping at BJ's Wholesale Club, I was reminded of something I had observed a few weeks back, at the peak of the holiday shopping season: the lines at the self-checkout were much longer than the lines at the "traditional" checkout.

I for one love self-checkout. I prefer as much as possible to avoid human interaction in a transactional environment, not only because I am naturally introverted but also because I arrogantly assume that I am less likely to screw something up than someone else. (I don't keep track of how accurate that assumption is, so don't ask.) Take pay at the pump, for example. I drive to the next station if the one I stop at doesn't have it. It's less of an issue now that they almost all have it, but this used to annoy me greatly.

Even given my own penchant for avoiding human contact, I did not expect to see such disparity at BJ's, since self-checkout is still an "emerging" technology with a few annoying bugs, and especially since your average BJ's shopper doesn't strike me as the early-adopting, self-checking type. And as much as I would have rather taken the matter of paying for my purchase into my own hands, my desire to get out of the store quickly won out, and I went to the traditional checkout line.

What about you? Do you like self-checkout, hate it, or something in between? Would you wait an extra few minutes to use it rather than enter a line with a human cashier?

Funny videos

If you have three minutes and grew up in the Nintendo generation, I think this video (warning: muffled swearing) will make you laugh. It's an animated short using clips from Nintendo games with overdubbed dialogue. Sort of like a prehistoric version of "Red vs. Blue," except actually funny.



This short was done by Lonely Island, the filmmakers partially responsible for SNL's funniest (perhaps their only funny?) bit in recent memory, a white-boy rap about seeing The Chronicles of Narnia on the Upper West Side. Incidentally, if you haven't seen that, it's now available as a free video download from iTunes. (If you don't have iTunes, that link won't work for you, and you should click here instead to watch it in your browser.)

Happy New Year everyone.